Do We Require Tougher Gun Control Laws?
One of the most controversial issues inside our society today is the subject of private weapon ownership and gun control laws. This kind of controversy has arisen generally due to the different methods that the second constitutional variation is viewed. The modification states that " a proper regulated militia, being required to the security of your free condition, the right to the folks to keep and bear hands, shall not always be infringed" (Lott, 2000). On one side in the issue, you will find those that believe the change guarantees the proper of individuals to provide and hold a wide variety of guns. On the other side are those that deal that the change was simply meant to ensure to Says the right to run militias. A very important factor that both equally sides agree after is that it can be up to the Best Court to resolve this controversy, as it is all their responsibility to enforce the U. T. Constitution. In the meantime, strict gun control laws and regulations have been made for the safety of the public. Weapon control laws and regulations serve their very own purpose very well, and through things such as criminal background checks, training, and permits, that they promote accountable gun title. Tougher gun control laws are not important and may not lead to virtually any intended benefits in society because they only attempt to solve issues that are not getting created by the lack thereof.
First of all, the assumption that tougher firearm control regulations will bring about a decline in crime is not really true. Most criminals that use guns violently are obtaining them intend to. Criminal gun users most commonly get their guns by buying them from good friends and other non-registered sources or perhaps by robbery. In this case, stronger gun control laws happen to be irrelevant will make no difference at all. The only method that harder gun polices are likely to achieve controlling firearm violence is if it could effectively restrict these illegal techniques of obtaining weapons. The weapon laws which have been in place at present do just what they are built to do. Firearm owner permit laws need that owners have this license in order to legitimately possess a firearm, even in a home, and in order to acquire the gun in the first place. " This kind of license can be not given until the applicant has passed through a check of official records to see if the individual has a preceding criminal certainty, and possibly to verify if they have a few other disqualifying traits, such as dependency on alcohol or mental illness. Purchase permit laws and regulations require a person to get a permit before buying that gun, and candidates must initial pass through a records check" (Gold, 2004). In addition for all the different types of record-keeping, restrictions, and regulations to have a gun, nearly all states stop the possession of guns by " high-risk" groups of the people. These teams consist of generally criminals, psychologically ill persons, drug addicts, alcoholics and minors. Lawful gun owners, those who follow every one of the gun control laws, as a group, be it natural or processed are not mentally abnormal or even more pro-violent than non-owners. " Most firearm ownership is usually culturally designed and related to a country hunting subculture. The culture is transmitted across ages, with recreation-related gun owners being socialized by their father and mother into weapon ownership and use by childhood" (Lott, 2000). The strongest and many consistent predictors of lawful gun control are hunting, being man, and becoming older and higher cash flow. As we is able to see, most legitimate gun ownership in the general public is related to outdoor recreation like hunting, rather than crime. The laws at the moment in place will be being and then these dependable owners, not by scammers. Stricter laws will just make it more difficult for these legislation abiding people to follow the law to obtain their arms, also to the crooks it will produce no difference since they already are not pursuing the law. All those things will decrease the number of offences committed is definitely decreasing the number of criminals out there. As unrealistic as it may appear, even if all the guns in the population had been...
References: Dougherty, Jon. (2001). Exploiting Suicide to Push Gun Control. Recovered October 3,
2006, from www.worldnetdaily.com.
Gold, S i9000. D. (2004). Gun Control. New York: Standard Books.
Lott, J. L. (2000). More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press.
McKenna, J. D., George T. I., & Feingold, S
Thompson, Dorothy. (2001, January 9). Non-public Gun Ownership Keeps the Criminals in
Young, Cathy. (2002, Mar 18). The Bias Against Handguns. The Boston Globe, p. A7.